FBI Attorney James Baker was unmistakably about his view that Hillary Clinton should be criminal charges. “I have reason to believe that you originally believed it was appropriate to charge Hillary Clinton with regard to violations of law – various laws, with regard to mishandling of classified information. Is that accurate?” Ratcliffe, a former federal prosecutor, asked Baker.
Baker described why he came to that interpretation, and how his mind was changed:
“So, I had that belief initially after reviewing, you know, a large binder of her emails that had classified information in them,” he said. “And I discussed it internally with a number of different folks, and eventually became persuaded that charging her was not appropriate because we could not establish beyond a reasonable doubt that – we, the government, could not establish beyond a reasonable doubt that – she had the intent necessary to violate (the law).”
Follow: American Sovereignty News 0n Twitter Or Facebook